Human activities on global warming is too much, too much carbon dioxide caused by the release of claims has been said for many years. Seems to have been endorsed by most people. And in fact, it is merely a pseudo-science, is not able to confirm some Western countries to stop developing countries play a role in development.
Earth has existed for about 45 billion years, if not there, then outside, and 50 billion years the sun will expand into a red giant the Earth when swallowed. Earth is now in middle age, there is no sufficient evidence that human activities, can be put to prematurely destroy the Earth. For decades the human is a short time, but for the planet, but only a moment. Why is referred to as the Henan Yu? That is because the ancient time, where lush forests, the growth of tropical and subtropical growing in today's elephants. According to an information that, when the average temperature in Henan Province, Guangdong Province with the present considerable. So ancient times, human life, slash and burn, not more than the current carbon emissions? extinction of the dinosaurs, but also these guys eat too much, too much CO2 exhaled by the relevant? is clearly a joke.
than in the past 3000 years, the Earth's average temperature in the vicinity of 23 degrees C, the temperature in 2006 is just around the average temperature (that is, the average temperature in 2006 was around 23 degrees C). temperature and the correlation between solar activity and organic matter not significantly associated with the use of global average temperature rise was not caused by human activities, this is the law of nature.
but on the contrary, the appropriate temperature can promote the growth of crops, rather than hinder growth; CO2 the growth of content can make more healthy lush forests, should be able to supply more of the wildlife. The higher the moisture content of air result in more snowfall, which in turn means more polar ice caps. So nature itself is A good control system, the trend of Earth's climate and the solar magnetic field just the trend with the energy output is consistent, not much human activity with the association. Not long ago, some people even reported that the cattle and sheep to fight every cause CO2 increases, call for a vegetarian not to raise more cattle and sheep hh
sort of argument a lot. but no one able to compelling data to prove that the Earth took place in recent decades much of the change in the number of predicted future The Earth will warm much more nonsense.
Earth is the mother. love her as much as possible scientific and rational use of energy is the right thing, but to say that human activities, causing global warming are too many cattle and sheep, and then destruction, but it obviously was a joke.
there are too many pseudo-scientific pseudo-report, the name of science under the banner of the political activities of some ulterior motives. In the past the U.S. and Europe into an industrialized society, why do not people say the Earth will thus warming; and when we get into the car of the society, it has become very popular so alarmist rhetoric, can not but think of China threat theory, some of the fallacy of the country. before Bush signed the carbon emissions, according to an agreement must, because the U.S. is big country vehicles; Well, now that China is not or may not sign such an agreement, so we have people with ordinary families over the two cars again signed? The world is now in the war, which a not for energy from? And if it is a vehicle emissions will allow global warming to do and destroy our homes, then, the earth is our common mother, has put the so-called low carbon emission standards for the country, is not the surrender of such technology to the United Nations, for all developing countries?
care of our common mother, right, right to use energy as fully as possible, but not in the name of science under the banner of preventing our progress in developing countries. Western countries are not about human rights? then, so our per capita fuel consumption per capita oil consumption is also to achieve their human rights in terms of re-bar.
for the national industry, it is also a barrier, the name of science and technology lies in the barriers, attempt to stop our industrial products to enter the low labor cost barriers to their markets.
how to break this barrier, we can only active in the face. because people under the banner of the name of environmental protection, care for our Mother Earth together right, to use energy as efficiently as possible right. So , improved engine technology as soon as possible so that our carbon emissions to achieve their early decades of efforts in our standards, even more than their standard, is the best way to break the barriers. Who does not know China has cheap labor in developing countries ? Who does not know our highest foreign exchange savings? That is our per capita several times higher than their efforts to return several times, that we sacrificed holidays, how much sacrifice their enjoyment in return. and now they want to stop us cheap products into the market of their country, this is usable only as barriers, such as pseudo-scientific argument.
the other hand, China is becoming a major oil importing countries, energy saving is also a priority. So the face of people's pre-emptive strike, we can only follow the rules of others to act. so our technological progress, and China was strong, and we have to make rules so that everyone can abide mm too far that day also, now, we need to be step by step to reach the so-called advanced standards.
China in terms of electric cars and clean energy, has achieved no small achievement, it should be said at the international advanced level. At that time Europe and the United States taking into account non-renewable oil sex, to go directly to the era of electric vehicles, but because of battery technology and power generation efficiency and hold down, but China is doing has been solid and practical use of technology. Today, one can directly throw Automotive Technology and enter the electric car era, the most reasonable way over, it is nothing more than the use of hybrid technology and the transformation of higher thermal efficiency engine technology. Even if electric cars, they have to power it, electricity is coming from? In addition to nuclear power, more the hydropower and thermal power, then, these power generation, will produce much carbon emissions? Moreover, there is the handling of used batteries, if not handled properly, the pollution as we direct more mm less than gasoline, even if it is not burning reasonable, even if carbon emissions high on it to a few grams.
people we can only follow the standard first-person, try to do research and development, using our own doorstep the largest car market, to produce better and more advanced vehicles, produce a better and more efficient cars (both electric cars or car), striking, so that they plot bankruptcy.
stop global warming is equal to the export products of developing countries, equivalent to the industrialization of developing countries into the higher set barriers.
global warming? I do not agree with this argument.
Sohu this car for the exclusive supply of original articles published, Sohu car all copyright, without permission, are not allowed to reprint
laws: the scientific community refute the article and the evidence of global warming man-made global warming hoax
how the matter?
of: this commentator
Abstract: According to a lot of information on man-made global warming hoax comprehensive introduction to the various aspects. The 11 scams are: 1, most point of the original failed .2 temperature data collection, data collection points where the temperature of urbanization. 3, wrong! you see the temperature history is not the actual data .4, serious exaggerate the role of carbon dioxide, .5, .6 computer models are sacrosanct, no physical evidence of the startling conclusions .7, there is no consensus in the scientific community .8, .9 corruption research process, serious conflict of interest .10, serious .11 exaggerated natural climate phenomenon that can not be falsified science. This is a comprehensive description to date the only Chinese man-made global warming a hoax article.
1, most of the raw temperature data collection point before the failed
Forecasters Anthony Watts is a man-made global warming was originally (hereinafter referred to AGW) of the devout. However, with his personal experience as a professional one can not be explained by the fact, coupled with significant media hysteria, Watts changed their views. Now, his personal blog on global warming as the world's most popular blog, visits even more than the advocate AGW hysteria RealClimate. In recent years, Watts and a group of like-minded volunteers dedicated to investigating the original temperature the quality of data collection points. As of April, they surveyed 534 ground stations. According to the U.S. government's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) weather station standards, they found that weather station has been in the survey, 56% is a serious failure of the (error above 5 degrees Celsius); 87% of the weather station failed (error higher than 1 degree Celsius). The big problem with weather station failed: the edge in air-conditioned, located inside the car parking the edge of the roof in the sun exposure, and so on.
these stations failed most of the measured data tend to side of global warming. For example, Orland, Calif., a qualified weather station, has not moved over 100 years The original temperature data shows that 100 years down the temperature but the.
another failure in a weather station Marysville, California, and likewise 100 years of history, now located near the air conditioning vents.
its acquisition The temperature data collected than Orland, California can imagine how much higher temperature.
Curiously, many of these stations are still unqualified for the volunteers in the field of his investigation, without spending a penny of taxpayers. and those who consume a lot of taxpayers hard-earned money of the scientists, but only that hide inside the comfort of air-conditioned room, with taxpayers hard-earned money to buy super computer, creating another point, warmer temperature data collected, it is one of man-made global warming hoax.
2, the original location of the temperature data points come take a look at the city of
qualified initial temperature data points. If these weather station set is qualified, many stations are still collecting high temperature. Why? because many weather stations in the history in the sparsely populated remote areas, as time progresses, gradually the area where the weather station urbanization. the consequences of urbanization, of course, is the average air temperature rise m the so-called does not mean that the average temperature rise in the Earth's surface, the less can be said that the increase in carbon dioxide caused temperatures to rise. In fact, the investigation that has not been urbanized area of the weather station, weather stations such as distance above the West only 55 miles away Point weather station, the temperature likewise recorded since 1835, there 175 years, the temperature only increased by 0.3 degrees Celsius. The record is only a slight change in temperature is significant because 1835 was a ; period. when the temperature admittedly low in history.
Unfortunately, many of the original location of the temperature data points are more or less affected by urbanization. This has resulted in raw temperature data look at the history of higher curves.
urbanization caused by higher temperature data is limited by objective conditions, equipment, measurement process caused by the normal changes. The temperature data should have been removed, not for the calculations. urbanization caused by changes in measurement data is not normal normal reaction to the so-called wrong! you see the temperature history is not the actual data
the most authoritative U.S. hurricane forecasters William Gray in the international climate change conference speech, said: Dr. James Hansen of NASA is the largest ever ; data manipulator. > in other basic science research, data is data, not can easily modify the original data. manipulation of the raw data, and continuously modify the history of each weather station temperature data collected, it is Dr. Hansen's forte. Hansen do not think Dr. pleasing to the eye of the data, he can look pleasing to the eye with other nearby weather station data from its mathematical methods can be Then use the other cities in the weather station temperature data raised the temperature data in rural areas! AGW advocates (hereinafter referred to as Dr. Hansen weird adjustment method used in some rural areas of the weather station is not, even by his history of lower temperature by 3 degrees Celsius!
these are adjusted after the temperature beyond recognition computing , I am afraid to let those who engage in other basic science research projects of scientists Dayton Koudai.
Hansen Dr. is not the original one-time adjustment of the temperature limited adjustments, he come back every month for decades historical data before the adjustments. For example, according to March 2008 the temperature data, Hansen and 1903, Dr. lowered the annual average temperature in 1946. Why do affect the temperature observations to 100 years ago, the temperature readings? fear Dr. Hansen can answer only. One thing is certain, it is global cooling, decreasing the actual temperature of the current situation, only to continue to lower the temperature history, can only prove that the so-called global warming.
Hansen Dr. significant adjustment will not only raw data. And he also did not exist coin Fitting Finally, even the average of available data changed.
Hansen, Ph.D., is a scientist employed by the government, by the taxpayers to feed. But, he not only to be adjusted so that the original temperature, but also announced he openly refused to adjusting the temperature of the taxpayers hard-earned money to write programs. belongs to the public all these procedures, but also not a secret. Later, under pressure, he reluctantly released the source code is not complete. So far, no one can be published based on his Copy the code from his original output.
temperature data organized according to three other data, drawn from the 10 years since the temperature curve (see below, click on the image to enlarge) shows that global temperature has not increased, but still falling. and according to Dr. Hansen GISS data, the global temperature is still rising slightly.
any manipulation, adjustment of raw data, which is man-made global warming hoax of the three. This is a particularly significant fraud.
4, grossly exaggerated the role of carbon dioxide
hysteria of global warming, carbon dioxide has caused everyone scared. In fact, carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has always been an indispensable ingredient. dioxide this indispensable, if not an integral component of the Earth plants will all die. Earth's ancient carbon cycle has been effective would be broken. This is unthinkable end of the world. Earth's ecosystem will die. dioxide is not a pollutant. as atmospheric main carbon components, carbon dioxide represents the vitality of the earth. In fact, according to the latest NASA satellite data, with the increasing concentration of carbon dioxide, the world's crop harvest, and the total amount of global green plants, is indeed improved a lot. < br> atmospheric carbon dioxide is not only an indispensable ingredient, and it is a very, very small components. dioxide levels in the atmosphere less than 400ppm. To understand how small this content, we can imagine the Earth's atmosphere condensed into a football field 100 feet long. began to count from one goal, 78 feet is nitrogen, oxygen is 21 feet. rest a foot, 6.5 inches is argon. the rest of the 3.5-inch, how much carbon dioxide ? only half an inch! to stand on the other side as a goalkeeper on the bottom line, he can not even see the goal on the other side near the half-inch.
for an analogy, if a fully packed stadium to accommodate 1 million people in which each of the audience is an air molecule, a million viewers which, only four of carbon dioxide! and the audience inside the four, only one is a recent 150 years before entering the stadium.
such a small content, it caused simply not enough to cause the greenhouse effect so-called water vapor. more water vapor than carbon dioxide greenhouse effect is much higher. On the whole, the temperature rise in atmospheric greenhouse effect, 70% are caused by the water vapor. In the dry desert areas, although hot during the day, one to night, the temperature immediately dropped a lot. Why? because there is not water vapor the air inside to retain heat from sunlight. And the desert region of carbon dioxide in the air quite content and other areas. the carbon dioxide, but not enough to not cause night desert temperatures rise. such a simple life example illustrates the greenhouse effect of carbon dioxide is negligible.
a contrary example is in extremely wet areas, people felt particularly in the evening back to the heat, even if daytime temperature far as hot desert areas. The reason is the same: during the day, a lot of water vapor in the air to keep the heat from the sun. This life examples from the other side of the greenhouse effect that is mainly water caused by steam.
such a common sense, is engaged in computer modeling of the : First, assume that the atmospheric carbon dioxide will increase overall system temperature. Then, the rise in ocean temperatures also caused the carbon dioxide dissolved in water and water vapor which was discharged. is caused by emissions of water vapor and temperature rise, temperature rise and directly caused by the water vapor. But water vapor is the Seoul and the media put this statement into a warming of the planet to have to continue to rise. That being the case, how can we assert that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse effect caused by the initiator of a minor, the culprit then?
carbon dioxide is not such a big role. Historically, the carbon dioxide concentration was 5 times now , AGW advocates have claimed that the exaggerate the role of carbon dioxide, which is the four man-made global warming hoax.
5, was sacrosanct
global warming computer models are based on physical phenomena is the carbon dioxide absorption of sunlight relatively high rate phenomenon. greenhouse effect is relatively more energy is left in the earth's surface, this is no doubt. However, the greenhouse effect of atmospheric temperature change is really the dominant force? < br> computer modeling claim that the global atmospheric system is a positive feedback system. The so-called positive feedback system, that is, as this process as the swing, push the power swing is always the same direction with the swing movement, heightened volatility, is always , the more swing higher. The output of computer models show that if global temperatures rise, there would be no constraints, out of control, rising.
In fact, the computer model builders from the beginning, it has been assumed that carbon dioxide will cause the overall temperature rise. This fact is used as input conditions, negative feedback mechanism, the positive feedback has basically modeled as a fact. according to the temperature rise of the input conditions, and assuming a positive feedback mechanism, the computer model output to the none other than the established model who would like to see results. This is the circular logic.
these computer models do not consider the following factors: changes in water vapor caused by changes in cloud cover, solar radiation caused by changes in cloud cover, volcanic eruptions, especially the submarine volcanoes; land development ; green change; plants absorb carbon dioxide; the global ocean current system, the anti-effect; animal emissions; real air pollution in developing countries; Earth's orbit changes, and so on.
especially the clouds change, simply ignore the computer models is a fundamental factor in the climate. water vapor increase, will cause an increase in clouds; clouds increase, would reflect sunlight to prevent heat reached the Earth's surface.
changes in sunspot activity is likely to affect the clouds gathered extent the biggest factor. sunspot activity is low, the electromagnetic radiation emitted by the sun more. These rays propagate to the Earth, will cause increasing clouds gathered, the surface temperature is lower. Recent studies have found that changes in sunspot cycle curve and surface temperature negative correlation curves of the relationship exactly. The relationship between carbon dioxide and temperature does carbon dioxide lags behind temperature change.
nature of our lives, never a positive feedback effect of the system only. On the contrary, nature has a strong self-regulatory function, is a vibrant, dynamic, flexible system. However, the nature of most of the negative feedback mechanisms, such as the clouds above feedback, the feedback of plants to carbon dioxide, and so are ignored by the computer model . so the result of the model, of course, is the atmosphere system, is a particularly large and complex chaotic system, the current human to accurately simulate the computer can not. This is, as long as 10 days to see the accuracy of weather forecasts to know. The long-term trend of the climate system simulation, more variables involved. even 10 days can not accurately forecast the weather, man-made global warming advocates who claimed they knew for decades to a century of weather conditions!
man-made global warming advocates with, basically allows the computer output any results they want. even if they did not deliberately distort the parameter settings, these adjustable parameters should be set to look like, but also far from a scientific conclusion. This is why computer model while the This is the over-reliance on computer models of another absurdity.
far less than the full use of computer models, can adjust its parameters, and fetish to the results of computer models, and ultimately, to global human way of life by the These computer models to control, it is man-made global warming hoax of five.
6, no physical evidence of the startling that must not only rely on theoretical models to a conclusion. the theory mentioned here, in the physics of modern natural science, the means are based on a small number of assumptions, a rigorous mathematical derivation and physical model construction. even through such a strict construction of the physical model mathematical reasoning, and ultimately was adopted to verify the actual physical evidence. climate uncertain. this uncertainty model, and more need to have the support of the physical evidence in order to be accepted as coercive measures to force people to accept. AGW claim that the concentration of carbon dioxide in the air has a direct correlation with the temperature. the fact is that the concentration of carbon dioxide in the air there is no direct correlation with the temperature. Over the past several thousand years of history and historical temperature graph shows the concentration of carbon dioxide , the temperature changes before the changes in carbon dioxide concentrations of 800 years. The following chart compares the temperature changes over the past 120 years and the relationship between carbon dioxide concentration (click to enlarge). the relationship between carbon dioxide and temperature, and only from 1968 to 1998, the 30 years which showed a positive correlation. And in that 30 years ago, 1930 years later, humans have begun to industrialization, creating a large amount of carbon dioxide, the temperature is falling. from 1998 to the current 11 years, carbon dioxide concentrations continue to increase, the temperature was did not rise. global warming by those who ask, Where is your physical evidence?
warming, often blame the person regardless of questioning their knowledge of science. scientific knowledge is to make such a startling conclusion AGW, not impossible, author must be given conclusive evidence. warming have a responsibility to make repeatable physical evidence of their strange, not the skeptics.
AGW not be physical evidence to support global warming are confused to advocate it as a scientific consensus. This is a man-made global warming hoax of six.
7, non-existent revolutionary theory anyway. warming claim: AGW can not doubt, because it is can not prove anything. a scientific theory is correct, never rely on scientific consensus that the positive and negative side of the head count to determine the number. On the contrary, often a small number of scientists question the consensus of the scientific community wrong, prove that the previous not accepted the theory is correct. science Xia Einstein discovered special relativity alone, is one such example.
not to say that global warming claim that the scientific consensus does not exist:
early In 1997, the historic Kyoto meeting will be held, a large number of scientists, weather experts have issued an open letter against the carbon dioxide global warming argument.
2007 �� 12 months, the UN Climate Panel (IPCC) in Indonesia meeting in Bali resort, when hundreds of scientists around the world published an open letter to UN Secretary-General, publicly questioned the AGW hysteria.
the same year a U.S. Senate report details a year in 2007, more than 400 major challenge AGW scientists.
2008 �� 4 months, participation in international climate change conference of hundreds of participants, including several climate scientists signed the Manhattan Declaration, to deny AGW argument.
Frederick Former U.S. National Academy of Sciences Seitz support the launching of 31,072 signatures, including 9,021 with doctorates in related fields signer. Signed professionals, including one of the most eminent physicist, Freeman - Dyson (Freeman Dyson).
British social scientist Benny Dr. Peiser 1993 survey to 2003 international scientific journals (ISI). He found that there is no so-called , only 13 clearly support the Any claims of environmental change, 14% said not sure.
other two researchers Dennis Avery and Fred Singer of the official papers by the database and found 500 climate scientists believe that climate change caused by natural factors.
famous Climate scientists against AGW are many. here only a few examples: University of Alabama senior research scientist Roy Spencer, Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor of climate Richard Lindzen, Colorado State University professor and hurricane forecasting expert William Gray, a pioneer of modern climate science University of Wisconsin professor of atmospheric and oceanographic Reid Bryson (recently deceased), Western Washington University professor Don Easterbrook, and so on. limited space can not be enumerated here. There are a limited non-exhaustive list, lists more name, and their specific objections.
Although the so-called scientific consensus does not exist, down. the mass media, science media, and even government research funds are using this big stick to suppress dissent. now, how many ordinary people know that 11 years the earth's temperature has not risen since the AGW, is equivalent to denying the Holocaust and acknowledge the Earth is ...
No comments:
Post a Comment